Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

2,877 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Bombay High Court Restrained Defendants From Using The Mark KOPRAAN By Way Of Passing Off Injunction

    We all know that there are multiple legal steps in place for a Businessman & Corporates, whether big or small, to take when there is a need.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Kevin Shah & Associates
    Kevin Shah & Associates
  • Article

    CGPDTM's Notice On Extension Of Limitation Period

    The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks (CGPDTM) has issued another public notice dated May 21, 2021 in furtherance to the Hon'ble Supreme Court's order...
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    S.S. Rana & Co.
    S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

Change In Amounts Of Individual Fees: Singapore

The Government of Singapore has notified to the Director General of the WIPO a declaration modifying the amounts of the individual fee payable in Swiss francs with respect to Singapore under Article 8(7) of the Madrid Protocol.
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
  • Article

    Composite Suit For Design Infringement And Passing Off Is Valid: Delhi HC

    A Special Bench of five judges of the Delhi High Court has held that had a composite suit in relation to the infringement of a registered design and passing off,
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Obhan Mason
    Obhan Mason
  • Article

    Deccan Declined: Trial Court Order Upheld

    The prevailing intellectual property scenario is infused with litigation hovering around the well-established tenets of deceptive similarity and passing off.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Lex Orbis
    Lex Orbis
  • Article

    Deceptive Similarity Among Alpha-Numerics

    The trouble faced by some of the most well established trademark owners is the fear of a deceptively similar mark emerging in the market.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Lex Orbis
    Lex Orbis
  • Article

    Delay In Instituting Passing Off Action Not Condonable

    Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., moved an ad-interim application for the action of passing off under the provisions of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1999, where in the Macleods Pharmaceuticalss sought an injunction from the court, to restrain the Tidal Laboratories from using the impugned trade mark "Rabemax" or any other mark bearing similarity to the Macleods Pharmaceuticals’s mark "Rabemac".
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Lex Orbis
    Lex Orbis
  • Article

    Delhi High Court Clarifies The Extent Of ‘Safe Harbour' Provisions For Intermediaries

    On 2 November 2018, the Delhi High Court (High Court), in Christian Louboutin SAS v Nakul Bajaj and Others (Civil Suit No. 344/2018) has laid down certain guiding principles in respect of liability of e-commerce platforms ...
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Khaitan & Co.
    Khaitan & Co.
  • Article

    Delhi High Court Provides Much-Needed Clarity On Parallel Imports Issue

    The parallel imports saga has seen many twists and turns, with conflicting views emerging from the courts and the customs authorities.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Ranjan Narula Associates
    Ranjan Narula Associates
  • Article

    Disparagement Or Humour: A Fine Line - A Case On Trademark Infringement: Royal Challengers Bangalore v. Uber India

    Cricket is not just meant to be a sport in India; it has become an integral part of Indian culture. People like to tease each other and crack jokes about their favourite teams, whether they are individuals or companies.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
    Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
  • Article

    Disrupting Distance: Hyperloop Technology And The Future Of IP Protection In India

    An idea that was once thought of as nothing more than a dream (a physique for a high speed, modern form of travel) is now becoming more and more real every day.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    S&A Law Offices
    S&A Law Offices
  • Article

    DLF Granted Injunction Over Infringement Of The Mark ‘EMPORIO'

    Hon'ble Delhi High Court, in the case of DLF Limited vs. Rediff.Com India Ltd. & Ors, granted an ad interim injunction in favour of DLF Limited, restraining Stanley Lifestyles Ltd. from using the mark...
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    S.S. Rana & Co.
    S.S. Rana & Co.
  • Article

    D´zine Garage Successful In Its Legal Design

    The trade name we use and the mark we see is what lends uniqueness to a trademark. To facilitate this, not only do establishments create patterns and designs, but also play with words, creating expressions that one may not have else put to normal usage.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Lex Orbis
    Lex Orbis
  • Article

    Ebay V. UKBAY

    Ebay, one of the popular e-commerce platforms, opposed the registration of one ‘UKBAY' at the UK Intellectual Property Office.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    R. K. Dewan & Co
    R. K. Dewan & Co
  • Article

    Eight Months Use Of A Mark Prior To Application –Claim Of Concurrent Use Not Valid

    The case of Needle Industries (India) Ltd. v. Super Thread Industries & Ors 2007 (34) PTC 614 (IPAB) started when Super Thread Industries/Respondents filed an application in 1988 for registration of the mark "PONY" in class 23 in respect of yarns and threads.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Lex Orbis
    Lex Orbis
  • Article

    Essentials to Succeed in the Case of Passing Off Revisited in NIVEA Dispute

    The Law of passing off prevents misrepresentation to the public in the course of use of unregistered marks.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Lex Orbis
    Lex Orbis
  • Article

    Establishment Of Technology And Innovative Support Centers In India

    WIPO's Technology and Innovative Support Centers (TISCs) have been established in India by the mutual agreement between Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT),
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
    Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
  • Article

    Evasive Tactics In Infringement Checked With Punitive Damages

    One of the frequently adopted tactics employed by the defendant is non-appearance or evasion of Court proceedings. Retention of account is one of the major grounds for relief and the most celebrated way of avoiding the same is through non-appearance. But, presently the Judiciary has formulated principles to place check on these tactics.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Lex Orbis
    Lex Orbis
  • Article

    Geographical Indication Assumes Importance In Trade Talks

    India and European Union have embarked on a bilateral trade & investment agreement, which envisages liberalization of trade in Goods, Investment & Service and higher protection for Intellectual Property Rights including Geographical Indications.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Lex Orbis
    Lex Orbis
  • Article

    Geographical Indications Laws In India: Challenges And Issues

    Geographical Indication (GI) is an important intellectual property right used in the realm of trade to highlight the origin of product which is exclusive to the territory or region where it is produced.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    S&A Law Offices
    S&A Law Offices
  • Showing 501–520 of 2877 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics