2,091 results found

The RBI, by way of a Circular dated June 5, 2026, has amended the regulatory framework governing investments by Foreign Portfolio Investors (‘FPIs’) in Government securities. With a view of providing greater ease of investment, the RBI has decided to withdraw the requirements for FPIs to comply with the short-term investment limit, security-wise limit, and concentration limit for their investments in Government securities under the General Route

SEBI, vide notification dated May 30, 2024, has revised the eligibility criteria for launching commodity futures contracts as prescribed under the Master Circular dated August 4, 2023 ("Master Circular").

AZB & Partners provides important legal disclaimers regarding the nature of their website, clarifying that no attorney-client relationship is created through website usage and that all information is provided solely for informational purposes. The firm emphasizes compliance with Bar Council of India regulations prohibiting solicitation while outlining user responsibilities when accessing their digital content.

The SC in Pila Pahan v. State of Jharkhand [1], inter alia, held that the judgments reserved before a High Court (‘HC’) must ordinarily be pronounced within three months from the date of the reserving such judgment.

Securities Exchange Board of India in its Board Meeting on 23rd November 2016 has approved the proposal to amend the Listing Regulations to require disclosures and prescribe additional conditions...

In Shailja Krishna v. Satori Global Limited, the Supreme Court of India held that the NCLT has the jurisdiction to decide allegations of fraud...

The Bombay High Court examines critical questions surrounding loan takeovers and arbitration under the SARFAESI Act in Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited v. Axis Bank Limited. This case explores the intersection of banking regulations, secured creditor rights, and arbitration jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Akash Kedia, Managing Director – Healthcare and Lifesciences, Alvarez & Marsal India, and Amit Misra, Managing Director – Healthcare and Lifesciences, Alvarez & Marsal India...

The Delhi High Court has ruled on the boundaries of comparative advertising, examining whether health-related claims about a competitor's products constitute permissible marketing or cross into commercial disparagement. The case centered on advertisements that directly referenced a plaintiff's trademarks while making adverse health insinuations, raising questions about truthfulness and consumer deception in competitive campaigns.

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that patent infringement and breach of confidentiality claims can coexist, rejecting arguments that patent disclosure eliminates trade secret protection. The case involves allegations that a former employee shared confidential process technology with a competitor, raising questions about the scope of disclosure required under patent law and the independent protection afforded to trade secrets.

Delhi High Court (‘HC’) in Peter Beck und Partner Vermögensverwaltung GmbH v. Prakash Industries Limited[1] held that amounts awarded by a competent court, whether Indian or foreign, towards damages...

Senior Advocate Arvind P. Datar analyzes the Safari Retreat judgment and shares insights on the interpretation of taxation laws in conversation with Advocate Vinay Shraff.

The judgment examines an important issue in commercial arbitration: whether an arbitral tribunal can restore a terminated dealership or franchise arrangement after holding the termination to be illegal.

The Supreme Court, through its judgment dated 29.10.2025 in Annamalai v. Vasanthi & Ors. , clarified the circumstances under which a plaintiff must first seek a declaration that the termination of the contract is invalid before pursuing specific performance of the contract.

Trends in Technology and E-Commerce in India: Legal and Tax Issues (May 14-15, 2015).

The Maharashtra Land Revenue Code Second Amendment Act, 2025 introduces transformative reforms to agricultural land conversion procedures in India. This podcast episode examines how the new legislation streamlines the NA conversion process through a single-window system and eliminates traditional bureaucratic requirements. Host Payal Jena analyzes the practical implications of these regulatory changes for landowners and developers.

In this episode, Aarya Singh discusses the Supreme Court’s decision in Raziya Begum & Ors. v. Nafisa Begum Abdul Hamid & Ors., decided on 7 August 2026.

The State Government of Uttarakhand on 9 November 2015 amended the 'Uttarakhand Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2008' (the Act) to provide for a special mechanism for collection of entry tax...