1,757 results found

The Delhi High Court, in two writ petitions filed by Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL), a registered company dealing with sound recordings and broadcasting, ruled on a...

In today's world, cinema is not restricted to being a mere source of entertainment. Rather, it acts as a medium for social commentary. Over the years, cinema has influenced our society in numerous ways.

The passing of the controversial directive garnered a lot of reactions, most of them being negative.

The European Union's Digital Single Market (DSM) Directive is an ambitious act that seeks to reform the Copyright Law in a multitude of ways, so as to accommodate modern and upcoming digital practices into the copyright sphere.

WIPO, through two independent Madrid Information Notices, has notified that in accordance with Rule 35(2)(c) of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol...

The case of Kaira District Co-operative Milk Producers' Union Limited ("Kaira") and Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. ("Gujarat") v. Amul Canada...

Moonlighting can be a real problem for employers who are unaware of their labor laws and legal responsibilities.

Deciding upon a dispute dealing with copyright in drawings and their theft is the case of Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v. Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited &; Ors.

In November 2019, the Delhi High Court heard a petition filed by Anurag Sanghi, who sought relief to quash a first information report (FIR)

As reported by Lawbeat.in, the Delhi High Court recently granted, as described by Justice Anish Dayal, a "dynamic+" injunction to Universal Studios, Netflix...

Celebrity rights are the most unprotected rights in the era of social media. It is imperative for the celebrity to protect their rights through the lens of IPR.

A celebrity is a somebody of fame. Any writer, actress, model, athlete, musician, politician, or anyone else who draws attention from the public...

In Cargil India Private Limited v M/s. M.M. Oil Enterprises (Notice of Motion No 1107 of 2019 in COMIP No. 425 of 2017), the Bombay High Court (Court) has once again passed a notable order whereby the Court imposed a sentence ...

Rule 16 (3) of the Copyright Rule 1958 states that: "The person applying for registration shall give notice of his application to every person who claims or has any interest in the subject matter of the copyright or dispute the right of the applicant to it."

Defendant: Rajat Mukherjee, Welcome Friends Productions LLP, Rohit Sehtia, Amrit Sethia, S.O.I.E. Ginza Industries Ltd.

At least the Delhi High Court thinks so. In a recent judgment passed by the Delhi High Court in the case of The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford & Others Vs. Rameshwari Photocopy Services & Another, . . .

In an era where digital technology allows for unparalleled imitation and manipulation, safeguarding personality rights has become increasingly crucial.