3,988 results found

In Rich Products Corporation & Anr. v. Indo Nippon Food Ltd 2007 (35) PTC 15 (Del.), the Delhi High Court decided on the issue of exclusivity in relation to whole and parts of a trademark.

Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd. is an Indian company founded in 1947 by the brother duo, Shri D.N. Shroff and Dr. S.N. Shroff, which manufactures and sells ayurvedic and herbal medicines in India and also exports...

Centre for IPR Promotion and Management (CIPAM), the other day reported that the Indian Patent Office has observed a dramatic push upwards over the previous years with regard to patent examination(s) and grant process.

Fundamental and religious rights often come into question with respect to Holy texts, practices and beliefs. Dealing with philosopher Swami Dayanand’s famous "Satyarth Prakash", the present suit [Sarvadeshik Press v. Usman Ghani and Ors. 2009 (38) PTC 67 (Del.)] dwells on the question of the Civil Court having the jurisdiction to entertain a suit to ban/issue an injunction on the publication of a book, which is in existence and is being published and read for the last 135 years.

Eros, being the owner of several films, had entered into a term sheet with Telemax (consisting of an arbitration clause) for granting content marketing and distribution rights in respect of films.

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Plaintiff/ Respondent) owned a trademark a trade mark called "CHYMORAL" and "CHYMORAL FORTE"

The Law of Equity bars a person from bringing an action arising out of his own misconduct on the basis of the maxim- “ex turpi causa non- oritur actio”. The case of Supriya Prabhu v. Janus Remedies 2008 (36) PTC 139 (Bom) is an illustration on the point.

The new millennium witnessed the technological revolution in every spectrum boosting up the economical standards of the country. The most reflective and operative area of technological advancement is in entertainment industry.

The mark "NIZAM" is being used by Mr. Rajesh Chugh (plaintiff in the original suit and Respondent in this Appeal) for his business of selling "Kebabs" and related food products.

The Apex court's decision of December 14, 2017 in the case of Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v Prius Auto Industries Ltd & Ors (Civil Appeal Nos. 5375-5377 of 2017) affirming the decision...

The Principles of Natural Justice find a place in all jurisdictions and legal regimen. The law seems frivolous without the edicts of the principle and governs every branch of law, irrespective whether new or old.

The matter has now been posted to November 13 for further hearing.

The appellant, an advance licence holder, procured intermediate goods without payment of duty from another advance licence holder under Notification No. 44/2001-C.E (N.T)...

The Delhi High Court has held that the act of unlocking/activating mobile phones after they were manufactured would not disentitle the merchant-exporter from claiming duty drawback on subsequent export...

The Supreme Court has observed that there is no justification for charging compound interest or penal interest during the period of loan moratorium which was allowed by the Reserve Bank of India from March 1 to August 31 last year on account of the COVID19 pandemic.

In yet another decision, reversing the judgement of Delhi High Court, the Supreme Court held that once parties consciously and with full understanding executed an amendment of agreement

A country's national flag is among the most important insignia of that country's identity.