Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

3,988 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Byju's' Creditlore To Continue: Supreme Court Clarifies Norms For Settlement With Creditors Under The IBC

    The last two years have been tumultuous for Think & Learn Pvt. Ltd., the parent company of the online education brand Byju's. Now, Byju's will continue to deal a bad hand with its creditors...
    IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
    BTG Advaya
    BTG Advaya
  • Article

    Nestlé Prevails In Pre-Grant Opposition

    The Patent law in India provides for a process of a pre-grant opposition, whereby opponents may pose their standing against the grant of the patent.
    IndiaIntellectual Property
    Lex Orbis
    Lex Orbis
Article

´COFFEE TIME´ Ordered To Be Removed From The TM Register

Maintaining the "purity" of the trademark register is one of the primary concerns of trademark practice in India. To enable this, the law provides for a procedure to apply for a rectification to be made in the Register.
IndiaIntellectual Property
Lex Orbis
Lex Orbis
  • Article

    APTEL Refuses To Review Order Dated 20.04.2026 Passed In OP No. 1 Of 2025

    The APTEL, through its order dated 27.05.2026 in the matter of DERC v. Forum of Regulators & Ors., dismissed the review petitions filed by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (“DERC”) seeking review of APTEL’s earlier order dated 20.04.2026 concerning conduct of strict and intensive audit of Delhi distribution licensees (“DISCOMs”); and (ii) commencement of liquidation of regulatory assets.
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    Arbitration Update | Deposit 100% Of The Awarded Amount For Stay On Arbitral Award

    The Bombay High Court in a recent case of Balmer Lawrie & Co Ltd v Shipli Engineering Pvt Ltd has held that when an arbitral award is in the nature of a money decree and it is challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996...
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Mansukhlal Hiralal & Company
    Mansukhlal Hiralal & Company
  • Article

    Expanding The Intellectual Horizon Of Property: An Analysis Under Ambit Of SC/ST Act

    In the groundbreaking ruling, the Apex Court in the case of Kshipra Kamlesh Uke & Anr. vs The Principal Secretary, Government of Maharashtra & Ors. [Special leave petition (Criminal diary no (s).49832/2024)] upheld the Bombay High Court's judgment ...
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    S&A Law Offices
    S&A Law Offices
  • Article

    High Court Of Delhi Clarifies Scope For Amending Section 34 Petitions Beyond Limitation Period

    In the present case, Raheja Developers Ltd. ("Raheja") filed an application to add new grounds and documents. Raheja argued that the proposed amendment raises a purely legal ground pertaining to lack of inherent jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal ("AT") to pass the award.
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    High Court Of Delhi Held That Delhi Courts Would Have Territorial Jurisdiction In A Recovery Suit Where Part Of The Cause Of Action Arose In Delhi

    The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 20.05.2026 in the matter of GAC Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Acer Logistics Pvt. Ltd., inter alia, held that under Section 20(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), even if part of the cause of action arises within the territorial jurisdiction of a court, such court would have jurisdiction to entertain the suit.
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    Madras High Court Dismisses Appeals By Indian Startups Against Google's New Billing Policy

    A division bench of the Madras High Court has denied the pleas filed by domestic startups challenging Google's new "User Choice Billing" policy. However, an earlier temporary protection against delisting was extended...
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Pioneer Legal
    Pioneer Legal
  • Article

    Recent Surge In Covid-19 Cases Results In Suspension Of Deadline For Time-Bound Ip Filings In India

    The recent rise in the COVID-19 cases in India led the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) to pass another order dated 27 April 2021 (SC Order) in Suo Moto Writ Petition...
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Khaitan & Co.
    Khaitan & Co.
  • Article

    Supreme Court Holds That A Party Cannot Challenge An Arbitral Award On The Ground That The Arbitral Mandate Has Expired When The Party Itself Has Accepted Extension Of Arbitral Mandate

    The Supreme Court of India, through its judgement dated 26.05.2026 in the matter of Gujrat Water Supply and Sewerage Board v Saryu Plastics Private Limited, held that a party cannot challenge an arbitral award on the ground that the arbitral mandate has expired, when the party itself has accepted extension of arbitral mandate.
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    Flat Owner Without Legal Title Has Consumer Rights

    In a noteworthy judgment, the South Mumbai Consumer Forum has apprehended that a flat owner legally occupying the flat would be a consumer, even if his title to the flat might be in dispute before a competent court.
    IndiaReal Estate and Construction
    S&A Law Offices
    S&A Law Offices
  • Article

    GST Update

    Recently, the Delhi High Court (‘Delhi HC') vide its order in the case of M/s Vaibhav Textile V. Senior Intelligence officer and Ors. [W.P.(C) 9834/2022] directed the...
    IndiaTax
    Phoenix Legal
    Phoenix Legal
  • Article

    Levy Of TDS On Quarterly Expense Provision Booked Through Suspense Account

    The Bangalore Bench of Tribunal in the case of IBM India Private Ltd. vs ITO: ITA No. 749 to 752/Bang/2012 & 1588 to 1591/Bang/2012 (Bang) held that the assessee was liable to deduct tax at source...
    IndiaTax
    Vaish Associates Advocates
    Vaish Associates Advocates
  • Article

    COMPAT Upholds Order Of CCI Closing Bid-Rigging Case Against Railway Suppliers Of Axle Mounted Disk Braking System (ADBMS)

    COMPAT by its order dated February 17, 2016 has upheld the order of CCI closing the case for bid-rigging for supply of Axle Mounted Disk Braking System (ADBMS) to Indian Railways.
    IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
    Vaish Associates Advocates
    Vaish Associates Advocates
  • Article

    Penalty Rationalization Under FEMA

    The recent ruling of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi (Appellate Tribunal) in the matter of Jaipur IPL Cricket Private Limited and Ors. v. The Special Director Directorate ...
    IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
    AZB & Partners
    AZB & Partners
  • Article

    SEBI Amends SEBI (InvIT) Regulations, 2014

    SEBI has introduced significant amendments to InvIT, AIF, and REIT regulations, lowering credit risk thresholds for liquid mutual funds and expanding investment flexibility.
    IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Sagus Legal
    Sagus Legal
  • Article

    Supreme Court Verdict On Effect Of Nomination In Respect Of Shares Of A Company

    Recently, the Supreme Court, in the case of Shakti Yezdani & Anr. vs Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar & Ors, held that a nomination in respect of shares of a company does not vest absolute legal ownership ...
    IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Pioneer Legal
    Pioneer Legal
  • Article

    CBI/ Police Cannot Ask To Furnish Demand Draft Or Deposit Money Under Section 91 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973

    In a significant ruling, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Exclusive Motors Pvt. Ltd. v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors., 2025:DHC:5662, ruled that investigating agencies cannot compel private parties to deposit money under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC).
    IndiaCriminal Law
    Vaish Associates Advocates
    Vaish Associates Advocates
  • Article

    Cheating Case To Be Quashed If No Allegation Of Dishonest Inducement Is Made

    The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated May 10, 2022 in Rekha Jain Vs The State of Karnataka & Anr. held that to make out a case against a ...
    IndiaCriminal Law
    S.S. Rana & Co.
    S.S. Rana & Co.
  • Showing 301–320 of 3988 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics