1,757 results found

In Neetu Singh and Anr. v. Telegram FZ LLC and Ors., the Delhi High Court (‘Court') held that Indian Courts can exercise jurisdiction over Telegram FZ LLC (‘Defendant 1')...

The Delhi High Court, in ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. OpenAI OpCo LLC, has delivered India's first significant ruling on the application of copyright law to the training and functioning of large language models ("LLMs").

District courts and certain High courts in India have the original jurisdiction to try suits pertaining to infringement of Intellectual property rights in India.

In this rapidly evolving world, the evolution of Intellectual Property Rights in the fashion industry has been nothing short of extraordinary.

We all know that the copyright of any literary/dramatic/artistic work lies with the author of the work even if the copyright is not registered provided, it is original.

Who will reap the benefit of a picture with millions of likes? The photographer who captured the image that reached millions of people, or the subject matter in it?

A very important issue regarding the jurisdiction of courts to entertain suits for infringement of trademarks/ copyright arose for consideration before the Division Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

The Copyright Office has invited objections/ suggestions from the general public/ stakeholders within 60 days from the publication of the notice.

The procedural aspects of any suit are as important as the substantive side and amid that, to assert on the subject of the competent jurisdiction of the court has always been controversial. The instant judgment in the First Appeal from Order in Dharampal Premchand Ltd versus Golden Tobacco Products 2007 (34) PTC 633 (Del.) (DB) discusses the territorial jurisdiction in a composite suit for infringement of trademark, copyright and passing off.

Copyright facilitates the grant of exclusive rights to an author or creator of an original work, including the right to copy, distribute and adapt the work.

The High Court of Delhi on November 10, 2021, issued a public notice, inter alia inviting suggestions regarding the revision/fixing of royalties for communication of ‘sound recordings' to the public by way of broadcast ...

Fashion Industry is one of the most innovative and emerging sectors. Every single day new products and ideas

The scope of the section was further expanded through a DIPP memorandum dated December 2016 by which online broadcasting too was brought under the scope of this section.

On September 12th, 2017, the Intellectual property office conducted a meeting with stakeholders.

Copyright in the design subsists for 10 years from the date of registration.

In the case of Tata Sky Ltd. v Sachin Cody & Ors, the issue arose when Sachin Cody (1st Defendants) launched a website using the domain name "tataskyplushd.com", the 2nd Defendant was the Registrar and the 3rd Defendant facilitated the hosting of the website.

Aspects such as Fashion, where a dedicated statute does not exist, and where aspects from different legislations may be drawn in, often find parties battling the applicability of these to their case.