3,988 results found

A three-judge bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court ("the Court") in the matter of Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 / 2020 titled as, In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation...

A three-judge bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court ("the Court") in the matter of Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 / 2020.

He was appointed as an Additional Judge of the Delhi High Court on April 11, 2008 and as a permanent Judge on July 6, 2011.

The CESTAT New Delhi has held that classification of goods by the importer, even if the same is not in conformity with re-assessment by the proper officer or even if it is held to be not correct...

The Delhi High Court has held that pre-institution mediation under §12A of the Commercial Courts Act 2015 is mandatory for counterclaims, just as it is for an original suit.

Delays in disciplinary inquiries have been a long-standing issue affecting employees in both government and private sectors.

The Larger Bench of the CESTAT has held that the hearing and resolution of the issue referred to the Larger Bench is be continued at the instance of the Intervener even if the case...

The Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of First ITO vs. MR Dhanalakshmi Ammal 1978 ITR 413 held that the true test to determine whether the transaction is benami or not is to look into the intention of the parties ...

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of interim relief available under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, addressing whether unsuccessful parties in arbitration proceedings retain the right to seek protective measures post-award. This landmark ruling examines the interpretation of 'a party' under the statutory framework and establishes the stringent standards courts must apply when evaluating such applications from parties who did not prevail in arbitration.

The SC in South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. SMS Ltd., held that a valid and enforceable arbitration agreement...

The Supreme Court through its judgement dated 07.04.2026 in Renuka v. the State of Maharashtra & Anr. affirmed that where the basic ingredients of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 are satisfied, the complaint cannot be dismissed at the pre-trial stage on the ground that the cheque was not issued towards a legally enforceable debt.

The Supreme Court in the matter titled as Ramesh Kumar Jain v. Bharat Aluminum Company Limited , through its judgement dated 18.12.2025 affirmed that, courts exercising jurisdiction under Sections 34 and 37 of the A&C Act do not sit in appeal over arbitral awards.

However, if there is a first charge statutorily created, dehors the non obstante clause conferring priority over other debts, the statutory charge would prevail

The Supreme Court through its judgement dated 27.10.2025 in the matter of Novenco Building and Industry A/S v Xero Energy Engineering Solutions Private Limited & Another held that when deciding a commercial suit involving an application for urgent interim relief in intellectual property infringement cases.

The Supreme Court through its judgement dated 07.04.2026 in State Bank of India v Amit Iron Private Limited & Others held that there is no right for borrowers to seek personal hearing before classification as fraud, however furnishing Forensic Audit Reports is mandatory.

The Supreme Court through its judgment dated 03.02.2026 in C. Velusamy v. K. Indhera, held that an application under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("A&C Act")...

The Supreme Court through its judgment dated 02.06.2026 in the matter of National Highway Authority of India v T. Younis & Another held that the limitation period for filing an application challenging the arbitral award is to be computed from the date on which the application under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A&C Act”) is disposed off by the arbitral tribunal.

Supreme Court through its judgement dated 06.02.2026 in M/s Nav Nirman Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. v Union of India held that, once an order confirming attachment under Section 8(3)...