Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JULY 2019

Relevance Of Intention In Benami Transaction

The Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of First ITO vs. MR Dhanalakshmi Ammal 1978 ITR 413 held that the true test to determine whether the transaction is benami or not is to look into the intention of the parties ...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

By
Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate
Supreme Court of India & Delhi High Court
Email Id: [email protected]
Mobile No.: +91 9810081079
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vpdalmia/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vpdalmia
Twitter: @vpdalmia

The Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of First ITO vs. MR Dhanalakshmi Ammal 1978 ITR 413 held that the true test to determine whether the transaction is benami or not is to look into the intention of the parties viz whether it has been intended to operate as such or it was meant to be colourable. If colourable, the transaction is benami; otherwise the transaction is not benami. It is for the Initiating Officer to establish that there was a motive to undertake a benami transaction. A mere allegation of Benami will not be sufficient. The Initiating Officer has to establish the benefit that a person sought by way of a Benami transaction and whether that motive has been achieved and also whether in order to fulfill that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

© 2026, Vaish Associates Advocates,
All rights reserved
Advocates, 1st & 11th Floors, Mohan Dev Building 13, Tolstoy Marg New Delhi-110001 (India).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

See more popular content from