662 results found

The Himachal Pradesh High Court examined whether an arbitrator's administrative duties as a senior government officer justify extending the statutory deadline for delivering an arbitral award. The case arose from a land acquisition dispute where the Divisional Commissioner, acting as arbitrator, could not complete proceedings...

The Hon'ble Supreme Court ("SC") in a recent case, clarified that the subsequent setting aside of an injunction order does not absolve a party from liability for disobeying the order during its validity.

The enforcement of security interest under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) frequently intersects with complex questions...

The relation between strict procedural compliance and substantive justice under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act)...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in its judgment dated 19 May 2026 in Lyka Labs Ltd. v. Modi Lifecare Industries Ltd., Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 726 of 2024...

The National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ("NCLT") in the matter of M/s. Akash Electrotek Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. NCC Limited and Anr...

The case of Champagne Moet and Chandon vs. Union of India & Ors .was an appeal by Champagne Moet (Petitioner), against an order passed by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) which dismissed Champagne Moet’s appeal against an order passed by the Deputy Registrar of Trademarks (DR).

In the case of Okasa Pharma Pvt. Ltd v Win- Medicare Limited, the issues before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) were two-fold.

The Chennai Bench of CESTAT ruled in favor of Toyota Kirloskar Motor in a customs classification dispute involving imported auto parts and ASEAN FTA benefits. The Department attempted to reclassify 226 automobile parts but failed to provide adequate technical evidence or individual article analysis to justify the proposed reclassification from one tariff entry to another.

The legal nodus of determining the Jurisdistion of Courts in cheque bouncing cases has finally been resolved by the Supreme Court of India.

The High Court of Bombay in an Order dated 12 September 2023 once again upheld that the High Court can conduct the exercise of determining the stamp duty payable under an agreement...

The Supreme Court's decision in Home Care Retail Marts Pvt. Ltd. v. Haresh N. Sanghavi addresses a critical question in arbitration law: can a party that loses in arbitral proceedings still seek interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after an award is rendered but before enforcement? This ruling resolves conflicting High Court interpretations and clarifies the scope of interim measures available to all parties, regardless of their success in arbitration.

India's 12-year limitation period for adverse possession claims creates significant vulnerabilities for EU investors holding land-backed assets, offering fewer protections than the UK's Land Registration Act 2002.

The Supreme Court of India recently, in Red Chilli International Sales v ITO [2023] 146 taxmann.com 224 (SC), set aside a judgment of the High Court...

The Supreme Court of India has delivered a landmark judgment addressing the intersection of procedural finality and the substantive inheritance rights of Hindu daughters under the Hindu Succession Act.

India's Supreme Court recently gave the country's standing as a jurisdiction hospitable to international commercial arbitration a major boost.

The fundamental objective of awarding damages in personal injury cases is governed by the principle of restitutio in integrum, which mandates restoring the injured party to their original position...

The petitioner invited an e-tender for the construction of 100 family quarters (Type II, III, and IV), including internal water supply, sanitary installations, and electrical works for the ITBP...