Asurion Recovers Bad Faith Domains.

Given Israel's abundance of lawyers, it is no surprise that disputes are commonplace.

The fact that a company's activities are provided primarily through the internet does not grant immunity from litigation in the Israeli courts or from Israeli law.

The District Court of Tel Aviv recently held that the Israeli courts gained jurisdiction when a statement of claim was served in Israel on the vice-president of a foreign company.

The Israeli Supreme Court has scrutinized and authorized the unofficial arrangement for the removal of harmful content published on online platforms.

The lower court had denied the applicants' request for a class action suit, and the present case was their appeal of that decision.

Tracking the whereabouts of individuals may be necessary to combat the Coronavirus pandemic emergency, but the means utilized by the Israeli government severely impact the right to privacy...

The Israeli Supreme Court ("Supreme Court") held by a majority opinion that extraterritorial service of an application for the approval of an Israeli arbitration award based upon an arbitration clause...

At the end of November 2017, the Constitution, Law and Justice Committee of the Knesset approved a revised draft bill to amend the Courts Regulations (Fees) ...

It is not uncommon for Israeli incorporated companies to seek investments abroad. In many cases, such investments are done through public offerings on international stock exchanges.

Recently, the Israeli Attorney General opined that foreign companies (specifically those that do business via the internet) may not escape Israeli court jurisdiction even if the terms and conditions posted on their website state otherwise.

The Israeli Class Action Law came into force in 2006, and formally regulates the proceedings applying to class actions in Israel.

Verifone requested the Court to strike out or stay the proceedings in Israel, in view of the pending litigation in the US Court.

The Israeli Supreme Court recently issued an important and precedential decision recognizing, for the first time, the enforceability of Chinese court decisions in Israel.

In a more decent world, we wouldn't need so many laws. Were society to conduct itself with a bit more polite refinement, its members wouldn't need to resolve the plethora of disputes unremittingly submitted before the courts.

On April 11, 2017, Amendment No. 18 to The Law of Legal Capacity and Guardianship, 5722-1962 came into effect. This is a wide ranging amendment regarding the institution of court-appointed guardianship.

Mr Justice Chamberlain has granted permission to Al-Haq, a Palestinian human rights organisation, to proceed to a rolled-up 3-4 day hearing of its challenge to the government's decision to continue granting licences.

It is recently apparent, that more and more key players and commercial as well as national entities world wide, are adopting an innovative conception, according to which, the most efficient and practical method to resolve commercial disputes and enforce such resolutions, especially internationally speaking, is by international arbitration rather then legal procedures in domestic courts wherever they may be.

The UE Law, anchored in principles of fairness, justice, and integrity, contemplates a world defined by human interactions (e.g. erroneous payment, building inadvertently across property lines, receipt of stolen funds...

Over the past few months rulings have been handed down that indicate tendency of courts to rigorously enforce moral rights of creators by awarding monetary compensation...