7,544 results found

In a recent procedural order issued by the Mannheim Local Division of the UPC (UPC_CFI_819/2024), the Court rejected an application made by three co-defendants requesting a separation of proceedings into three distinct strands of litigation...

Brie Stevens-Hoare QC and Cameron Stocks discuss the practical and tactical impact of the Court of Appeal's decision in Hirachand v Hirachand ...

The textbook is a practical and concise but thorough survey of the many legal issues affecting airspace and subsoil. The book covers freehold and leasehold ownership, easements, manorial rights...

Simon Kerry and George Eyre discuss some recent case law and developments over the last 12 months on issues relevant to adjudication.

The Supreme Court held that the place where the "harmful event" had occurred for the purposes of Regulation 44/2001 Article 5(3) was Germany...

Court rules arbitrator had jurisdiction to take into account matters which occurred after the award when award remitted

How did a change in pay policy lead to an indirect discrimination claim and was the discriminatory effect justifiable?

In cases raised in the Court of Session the instruction of an Advocate or Solicitor-Advocate is required. In the Sheriff Courts, the position is much less clear-cut.

The issue therefore arose whether the defendant had been validly served.

Bayer announced on Wednesday, June 24, it will pay up to $10.9 billion to settle a majority of approximately 125,000 claims that Monsanto's weed killer Roundup causes non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This webinar forms part of our Behind the Façade Series.

This is the first full trial judgment in a case that has considered whether related companies can be made liable for damage that occurs overseas...

Last month we reported that the Court of Appeal (The Director of the SFO v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Limited [2018] EWCA Civ 2006) ...

In a landmark judgment, the UK Supreme Court has dismissed the Claimants' conjoined appeals against the strike out of their secondary victim claims for psychiatric injury...

Where now for litigation funding? The likely impact of the Supreme Court's decision in R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others [2023] UKSC 28.

In this summary judgment Cargill succeeded in arguing that an interest rate applicable to late payment did not operate as an unenforceable penalty.

The Home Office has recently published a Statement of Changes to the Immigration Rules which includes changes to the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS)...

In a landmark judgment, the UK Supreme Court by a 6-1 majority (Lord Burrows dissenting) has dismissed the Claimants' conjoined appeals against the strike out of their psychiatric injury claims...