97 results found

On 30 August 2007, China’s Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) was passed on its third reading before the Standing Committee of the People’s National Congress (NPC). The AML has finally been adopted after almost 14 years of planning, drafting, and debate. It will become effective on 1 August 2008.

Develoments in civil liability arising from false statements in securities markets.

'바왕차지' 고모방(高仿) 매장 상표권 침해 사건이 최근 판결이 확정되었음. 광시 라이빈의 '차지후이우(茶姬荟舞)'라는 밀크티 매장이 정품 매장 옆 20미터 거리에 개점하여 상표, 인테리어 및 제품명을 전면적으로 모방한 혐의로 난닝 지식재산권 법정에서 상표권 침해 및 부정경쟁행위로 인정되어 35만 위안 배상을

In August 2007 the Committee of the National People's Congress adopted the Anti-Monopoly Law, designed to enhance fair competition and regulation of the market. The new law took effect August 1, 2008.

In late August 2010, it was reported in the press that at least 10 antitrust private actions have been heard in the courts in China . . .

Courts in the People's Republic of China recently have taken several steps to clarify enforcement procedures under the new Anti-Monopoly Law ("AML").

China has expanded the cross-border Renminbi settlement pilot scheme, which commenced on a limited scale a year ago. The recently issued Notice on Relevant Issues in Expanding Pilot Projects for Settlement in Renminbi in Cross-border Trade[1] ("Notice") expands the scope of the scheme to enterprises in 20 provincial-level regions[2] for transactions with all of China’s trading partners.

On April 18, 2016, the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate issued Interpretations of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues...

An instant noodle manufacturer recently announced that it decided to increase prices for its "container instant noodle" (referring to both instant noodles packaged into a variety of "cup-like" or rectangular containers) from 1 April 2011. In China, this instant noodle manufacturer is considered one of the leading brands in relation to the instant noodle industry.

This explores the First Conduct Rule and its significance for companies preparing for implementation of the Ordinance.

China's new Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) takes effect on August 1, 2008. For those that conduct business in, sell into, purchase from, or have strategic investments in China, or foresee doing so in the future, it is essential to understand the effects of this new law.

Recently, the Jiangsu Administration for Industry & Commerce ("Jiangsu AIC") issued sanctions against the Concrete Committee of the Construction Materials and Construction Machinery Industry Association of Lianyungang City ("Association") and 16 concrete manufacturers for breach of the Anti-Monopoly Law, by way of having entered into a monopoly agreement.

On 2006 January 1, the Judicial Interpretation of China Supreme People’s Court for Resolving Disputes Concerning Letters of Credit (Judicial Interpretation) entered into force.

As part of the settlement, ZTE will remain under probation for an additional seven-year period and submit itself to active auditing and monitoring by the US government.

China's Ministry of Commerce ("MOFCOM") today announced that it has approved a proposed 1.6 billion dollar takeover by Japanese group Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd ("Mitsubishi Rayon") of unlisted UK acrylics market Lucite International Group Limited ("Lucite"), subject to several significant conditions.

We understand from media reports that on 18 February 2011, Hudong1 (a Chinese internet search engine) made an Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) complaint to the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) against Baidu2 (arguably the most often or commonly used internet search engine in China; often referred to as China's equivalent of "Google").

President Trump's May 2026 state visit to China yielded agreements on trade boards, agricultural purchases, and tariff stability, but tensions persist over export controls and military company designations. As both nations pursue "strategic stability," multinational companies face increasing compliance conflicts from competing regulatory frameworks. Will the planned bilateral forums successfully navigate friction points in semiconductors, rare earths, and defense sectors?