619 results found

最高人民法院发布了2021年中国法院10大知识产权案件和50件典型知识产权案例，惠氏有限责任公司商标权纠纷案入选10大知识产权案例。

2月22日、国務院新聞弁公室は記者会見を開催し...

Disputes cannot always be prevented. Contracts must therefore provide for an effective means of dispute resolution.

It is generally accepted that the first explicit use of the term "public figure" in Chinese court documents was in a case heard by the Shanghai Jing'an District Court

Recently, Beijing Intellectual Property Court appointed for the first time 37 technology investigators and 27 technical experts.

3月8日、北京の人民大会堂で開催された第14回全国人民代表大会第2次会議において、...

4月21日，最高人民法院举行2022年知识产权宣传周新闻发布会，发布《中国法院知识产权司法保护状况（2021年）》，介绍了过去一年中国法院知识产&

If I were to list out the most common litigation-inducing problems our China lawyers have seen in the last few years, that list would consist of the following...

Two U.S. brands recently battled brand squatters in China with very different outcomes. Facebook won. Apple lost. Jason Wang and Amy Hsiao look behind these different results for strategic insights.

The Opinions on Several Issues in Enhancing Reform and Innovation in Hearing Intellectual Property Cases issued by the "Two Offices" ...

Beijing EAST IP Law Firm presents a list of the most innovative IP cases of the previous year.

In two recent trademark administrative cases, Supreme Court of China for the first time recognizes the value of consent letter issued by the cited trademark owner and allowed two nearly identical trademarks....

The plaintiff, in this case, Syngenta Seeds (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (Syngenta for short), owns the right to a new variety of pepper named "Marceau".

SEB SA owns an invention patent titled "Dry Fryer" (ZL200910159735.8, application date June 8, 2005, priority date June 8, 2004 and granted on April 13, 2011) ("Patent").

The Supreme People's Court has issued landmark rulings in two patent infringement cases that establish a crucial legal standard for preliminary injunctions issued alongside first-instance judgments. These decisions clarify when and how courts should maintain injunctive relief during the reconsideration stage, particularly when substantive hearings have already established infringement.

The Supreme People's Court has issued a landmark ruling clarifying that patent inventiveness must be assessed holistically, considering all technical features and their coordination relationships together rather than evaluating each feature in isolation. This decision addresses a critical methodological question in patent examination: how should reviewing bodies properly evaluate the inventive contribution of interconnected technical features to avoid the trap of hindsight reasoning?

上海知識産権法院は「栄耀（HONOR）」など著名ブランドを巡る商標権侵害事件について集中的に審理を行い、悪意あるブランドへの便乗や反復的

In January 2024, the Supreme Court of the People's Republic of China (the "Supreme Court") issued ten leading cases in respect of judicial review of arbitration.