241 results found

On 14 September 2015, the Court of Appeal of Mons permitted parallel imported pharmaceutical products to be repackaged and sold in package sizes that are predominant on the Belgian market.

On 16 November 2015, the Mons Court of Appeal (the "Court") handed down a judgment in a dispute between Verabel, a trademark holder, and Verandas Confort, which used the word 'Verabel' as a Google AdWord.

The Belgian Supreme Court ruled in a judgment of Oct. 7, 2021 that a data subject has the right to lodge a complaint with the Data Protection Authority...

Under the Lucky4All scheme, groups of lottery players play together in an eight-level pyramid scheme.

In 2007, Klausner Group, of which the applicant is part, had concluded a contract for the supply of wood with the Forestry Administration of the Land of North Rhine – Westphalia (the "Land").

The EFTA Court found that the principle of equivalence dictates that national procedural law must remain neutral in relation to the origin of the rights invoked.

On 22 April 2016, the General Court ("GC") handed down judgments in three related cases concerning exemptions from excise duties granted by France, Ireland and Italy to alumina producers...

The BCA filed a further appeal against this latter judgment before the Belgian Supreme Court.

As regards Request 1, the Court overturned the Commission's decision denying AXA access to the section of the index which described documents relating to leniency applications.

On 16 April 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("ECJ") ruled on a request for a preliminary ruling from the Hungarian Supreme Court...

In 2005, NMB (principal) and UNAMAR (commercial agent) entered into a commercial agency agreement for the operation of NMB's container liner shipping service.

InBev brought a cease-and-desist action before the Court for infringement of its Jupiler trademark.

On 20 March 2014, the President of the Brussels Commercial Court ruled on a dispute between Christian Louboutin and Van Dalen Footwear B.V.

On 25 July 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union handed down its judgment concerning energy labels in a case involving Dyson and BSH (ECJ, 25 July 2018, Case C-632/16, Dyson Ltd and Dyson BV v. BSH Home Appliances NV).

The request was made in the context of a dispute between Ms Froukje Faber and a garage called Autobedrijf Hazet Ochten BV.

First, the Court looked at Cadbury's assertion that the trade mark had not been used with respect to all the relevant goods.

Brexit dismantled the Brussels I Recast regime for the UK and resulted in a fragmented framework of domestic rules and a residual treaty.

This appeal from the General Court has provided Advocate General Kokott with an opportunity to give her opinion on two important practical issues...