Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 NOVEMBER 2018

EFTA Court Judgment On Limitation Period For Damages Claims

Van Bael & Bellis
Van Bael & Bellis
Contributor
Van Bael & Bellis

Van Bael & Bellis

Van Bael & Bellis is a leading independent law firm headquartered in Brussels with offices in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Van Bael & Bellis

The EFTA Court found that the principle of equivalence dictates that national procedural law must remain neutral in relation to the origin of the rights invoked.

European UnionAntitrust/Competition Law

On 17 September 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Free Trade Association States (the "EFTA Court") handed down its judgment in Nye Kystlink AS v. Color Group AS and Color Line, Case E-10/17, answering preliminary questions asked by Norway's Borgarting Court of Appeal (Borgarting lagmannsrett), in a case concerning the limitation period for bringing damages claims subsequent to a competition law infringement decision imposed under Articles 53 and 54 of the European Economic Area Agreement ("EEA"), the corresponding provisions of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.

In 2005, Kystlink AS, a Norwegian ferry company, brought to the attention of the Norwegian Competition Authority the existence of an alleged anti-competitive exclusivity agreement between one of its competitors, Color Line, and the Municipality of Strömstad. Due to cross-border implications, the Norwegian Competition Authority referred the case to the EFTA Surveillance Authority ("ESA"). On 14 December 2011,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from