1,467 results found

The offence is "Taking a motor vehicle or vessel with assault or with occupant on board" with up to 10 years in prison.

Dangerous driving offences are some of the most common driving offences prosecuted in the District Court of NSW.

Traditional approaches to managing risk can lead to an inconsistent approach to managing risk across business units.

Investors, banks and companies active in the shipping sector should update transactions using LIBOR which run past 2021.

This White Paper refers to some of the projects that may now require careful consideration and adaptation to the ATO's views.

The traditional land owners aren't going to budge, and have suggested an alternative route in the north for the highway.

A repairer was held to be bailee of a boat, even where the bailor retained a key and the boat was left at an unsecured mooring.

A discussion on Article 4 rule 2(a) of the Hague Visby Rules and its use as a defence when challenged by a Master's behaviour. A discussion on the allocation of responsibility between the carrier, the ship and the cargo interests.

The case is useful, significantly for its commentary of the defence regarding the rule relating to fraudulent devices.

Discussion of Thornton v Sweeney [2011] NSWCA 244

Insurers should consider the impact of driverless cars on negligence, product liability and cyber security insurance.

In an interesting and long-anticipated decision, the Federal Court has ordered the partial cancellation of registrations for the trade marks DUNLOP and (DUNLOP/FLYING D Marks)

The Situation: It is relatively uncommon in Australia for workers or employees to bring class actions against their employers in which they allege sham contracting arrangements.

A driver of a motor vehicle owes a duty of care to their passengers and other road users, including cyclists.

The NSW Court of Appeal judgment represented a major step forward for class actions in the travel services domain.

We consider key implications for access seekers, port operators and port privatisations.

A recent decision from the NSW Court of Appeal held that Article 9 of the relevant IATA Standard Group Handling Agreement (SGHA) was not a binding arbitration agreement within the meaning of the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth). The decision is of importance to carriers and ground handlers operating under that wording, including in international aviation ground handling arrangements.