1,091 results found

On 4 March 2026, the Supreme Court of NSW handed down a decision which discussed the distinction between works defects and incomplete works, explored whether mere dissatisfaction of works is deemed defective, and provided a reminder of the importance of an expert witness’ independence when preparing a report (lest their opinion be given less weight as a consequence).

A ‘pay when paid' provision is one where the release of retention under a subcontract is dependent on the operation of a clause of the head contract.

Cyclists who suffer injury as a result of the negligence of a motorist, may claim compensation from the driver's insurer.

The Hollingdale case revisits the issues associated with managing employees with a mental disability and, in particular, the manifestation of anti-social behaviours in the workplace.

Whether the respondent’s Amended Statement of Claim was sufficiently pleaded, in light of the decision of AA v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Maitland-Newcastle [2026] HCA 2.

The Background: Sanda v PTTEP Australasia (Ashmore Cartier) Pty Ltd raised the question as to whether the Federal Court of Australia possesses the power to consider an extension of time...

The principles underlying contractual construction have been the subject of much debate between intermediate courts in Australia.

Victoria's Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2025 fundamentally reshapes institutional accountability for child abuse by expanding vicarious liability beyond employees to include volunteers and others...

In an age driven by technology, employers are increasingly using biometric technologies, such as fingerprint scanning and facial recognition, as a way to deal with employee identification, absenteeism, and workplace surveillance.

In this decision, the NSW Court of Appeal examined the construction of the section, including the impact of a zeugma.

This decision set a higher threshold for determining applications for a court inquiry into the conduct of liquidators.

The Coronial Council of Victoria has been asked to review the appeals and reopening processes for these investigations.

In BEABA v Biba (Zhejiang) Nursing Products Co., Ltd [2022] SGIPOS 5, BEABA successfully opposed Biba (Zhejiang) Nursing Products Co.'s ("Biba") applications...

These cases show the importance of structuring IP ownership at the outset, and considering future infringement claims.

The right guidance and understanding can effectively appeal a refusal for a more favourable outcome.

The purpose of interest awards in court cases is to compensate for the loss of the use of the money.

The actions confirm that Australian courts will only in very limited circumstances overturn a determination under the statutory adjudication process.

Like any party to a civil proceeding, regulators can make submissions or reach agreement on an appropriate penalty.