The adopted increase will be provisional, since the INPI has already announced that there will be a further increase on October 2016.

The new president is member of the International Trademark Association (INTA) and has served as a Partner at the Argentine law firm PAGBAM IP.

On December 13, 2011, in the case "Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Sandoz S.A. et al on patent infringement. Damages", Division 1 of the National Court of Appeals on Federal Civil and Commercial Matters examined the requirement of appraising the amount claimed when filing a complaint for patent infringement.

L'INPI argentin a modifié la procédure d'examen des marques (Résolution 583/2025, 11 décembre 2025).

On December 19, 2011 the Argentine Patent and Trademark Office issued Resolution No. M-1735/11 which provides that renewal applications filed as of January 1, 2012 will be granted for 10 years counted from the expiration date of the registration that is being renewed.

An MoU was signed by the Argentinian, Brazilian, Chilean, Colombian, Ecuadorian, Paraguayan, Peruvian and Uruguayan PTOs, all members of the regional collaborative project on Industrial Property PROSUR.

El primer aumento, de un 20% aproximadamente, ocurrirá el 1 de agosto de 2017. Tal como sucedió en otras oportunidades, el aumento se llevará a cabo en dos etapas...

On November 10, 2011 Division 1 of the National Court of Appeals on Federal Civil and Commercial Matters confirmed the decision of the lower court in the case "Ediciones Proa y Alífaro, Roberto Francisco v. Fundación International Jorge Luis Borges y Kodama, María".

Incorporation of the 11th Edition of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Registration of Trademarks.

Division 2 of the National Court of Appeals on Federal Civil and Commercial Matters reversed the lower court's decision that had admitted defendants' plea of lack of jurisdiction in re "Christian Dior Couture S.A. v. Elbien S.A. and others", and decided that the Argentine federal courts had jurisdiction to hear the case.

On December 1, 2015 resolution No. 109/2015 entered into force. It was issued by the National Registry of Internet Domain Names, and created three new extensions and new fees for the registration of domain names under the country code ".ar".

Continuing with our previous communication concerning the increase in the official fees from the local IP National Office (INPI), we inform you that finally, Resolution 388 from the Ministry of Production has been published, arranging said increase from August 19, 2016. As we informed, the rise will be implemented in two stages, so there will be a second increase in October, 2016.

Continuando com a nossa anterior comunicação relativa ao aumento nas taxas oficiais do Escritório Nacional de IP local ( INPI), informamos que, finalmente, a Resolução 388 do Ministério da Produção foi publicada, ..

Continuando con nuestra comunicación anterior relativa al aumento de tasas oficiales por parte del Instituto Nacional de Propiedad Industrial (INPI), informamos que finalmente ha sido publicada la Resolución 388 del Ministerio de la Producción

In re "Apple Computer, Inc v. Goldfarb, Roberto Jaime" Division 2 of the National Court of Appeals on Federal Civil and Commercial Matters held that Apple Computer’s characteristic apple design is a well-known mark in Argentina and considered that it was an important distinctive factor that avoided confusion with the opposing trademark.

The term to respond to an office action issued during substantive examination will be of 45 days, which can be extended once for an additional 45-day term.

The case was brought before, the Supreme Court to resolve the after two courts fought for this case.

In July, the Argentine Patent and Trademark Office (INPI) issued the resolution P-183, instituting a new opposition proceeding, which entered in force on September 18, 2018.

In this way, the CJEU resolves once again against the expansion of ¨copyright protection¨ to other human creations by highlighting the limits that this intellectual property right requires in order to be claimed.

It is important to remark that Adidas had not proceeded to register its three lines before the EU until this point.