Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Research+

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Research+

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    EU—Court Of Justice Clarifies When Courts May Rely On Unlawfully Obtained Personal Data As Evidence

    The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled on whether national courts may use personal data as evidence when that data was obtained in violation of GDPR provisions. The judgment addresses the tension between data protection rights and the right to a fair trial, establishing conditions under which unlawfully obtained evidence containing personal data may be admitted in court proceedings. This decision has significant implications for how courts across the EU balance privacy protections with the adm
    European UnionPrivacy
    A&O Shearman
    A&O Shearman
  • Article

    A New Frontier For Added Subject-Matter At The EPO?

    The European Patent Office's recent referral of case T 873/24 to the Enlarged Board of Appeal may extend last summer's landmark G 1/24 decision on claim interpretation to the analysis of Added Subject-Matter.
    AfghanistanIntellectual Property
    Crowell & Moring LLP
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article

    The Decision in G 1/25: A More Relaxed Approach to Description Amendments in Europe?

    The European Patent Office's Enlarged Board of Appeal has issued its decision in G 1/25, addressing the contentious practice of description amendments in European patent applications. This decision establishes new guidelines on when patent descriptions must be modified to align with claims, potentially reshaping prosecution strategies across Europe. The ruling adopts a middle ground between the EPO's traditional approach requiring extensive amendments and recent case law suggesting such changes lack explici
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    How To Justify A No-poach Agreement: CJEU Refines Applicability Of Competition Law To Sports In Tondela Judgment

    The Court of Justice of the European Union has issued a landmark ruling on no-poach agreements in professional sports, examining whether such arrangements can escape classification...
    AfghanistanAntitrust/Competition Law
    Macfarlanes LLP
    Macfarlanes LLP

Showing 1–4 of 4 results