Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2025

Victoria's Secret: Protecting Its Iconic Brand

KBZ Zuradzki Barczyk & Partners Advocates and Attorneys-at-law LP
Explore more from KBZ Zuradzki Barczyk & Partners Advocates and Attorneys-at-law LP

Victoria's Secret is a household name in the lingerie market, but behind its iconic brand is a significant legal battle to protect its reputation.

PolandIntellectual Property
KBZ Zuradzki Barczyk & Partners Advocates And Attorneys-at-law LP
KBZ Zuradzki Barczyk & Partners Advocates And Attorneys-at-law LP

1570502a.jpg

Victoria's Secret is a household name in the lingerie market, but behind...

Victoria's Secretis a household name in the lingerie market, but behind its iconic brand is a significant legal battle to protect its reputation.

A key case in this fight was Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. (2003), where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Victoria's Secret had to prove actual dilution of its trademark (not just likelihood) to win a legal claim. This ruling was based on the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1996.

Trademark Dilution Explained

Trademark dilution happens when a famous brand's distinctiveness is harmed by a similar mark—even if the marks are used in different industries. The case centered on a store named "Victor's Secret", which wasn't in direct competition but still posed a risk to Victoria's Secret's brand.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from