Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JANUARY 2025

Key Arbitration Principles From An Egyptian Court Of Cassation

The case involved a contract dispute between a broadcasting company and a software provider over the production and airing of a television program.

OmanLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Case Study: Key Arbitration Principles from an Egyptian Court of Cassation

The case involved a contract dispute between a broadcasting company and a software provider over the production and airing of a television program. The contract included an arbitration clause, and when a disagreement arose, the matter was referred to arbitration. The arbitral tribunal awarded significant damages in favour of the broadcasting company, but the software provider challenged the award based on several legal grounds.

The case addressed three key legal issues, which are discussed in detail below:

  1. Challenging an Arbitration Award Due to Alleged Errors in Assessing Damages

One of the primary legal questions in this case was whether it was possible to challenge the arbitration award on the grounds that the tribunal made errors in assessing damages. The appellants argued that the tribunal awarded excessive damages without explaining the elements of the harm. However, the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from