In the bounced cheque cases and during the judgement execution
stage, the authorized manager may be surprised by arrest orders
even though both the cheque and judgment are related to the
company's activities, not the manager personally. Such orders
sometimes force the manager to pay sums of his own money to avoid
the consequences of those orders.
Why the person who signs a bounced cheque is imprisoned
although the cheque is issued by the company and relates to its
commercial transactions?
In the bounced cheque lawsuit, the plaintiff requests the court
to obligate the accused/defendant, who signed the bounced cheque on
behalf of the company, to pay the value of the cheque. Suppose the
court convicts the accused/defendant of the crime of issuing a
cheque with no existing balance; in that case, the court shall
accept the plaintiff's request based on the last paragraph of
Article 356 of the Penal Code, which reads: " ... In all
cases, the court shall oblige the
