Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2017

To Settle Or Not To Settle: All Bets Off In Cartel Cases

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Contributor
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Our clients are increasingly operating in South-East Asia and require legal assistance in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Losing out on the 10% fine reduction in return for settling isn't the only risk when pulling out of settlement negotiations with the European Commission.

NetherlandsAntitrust/Competition Law

Losing out on the 10% fine reduction in return for settling isn't the only risk when pulling out of settlement negotiations with the European Commission. The European Court of Justice recently confirmed that abandoning the settlement procedure could, paradoxically, result in a higher fine for a shorter cartel duration. Companies should think twice before deciding on whether or not to settle, since there is no certainty as to when the best deal can be struck, either in the settlement procedure or in the standard cartel procedure.

The European Court of Justice confirmed the fine imposed by the European Commission on the Roullier group for its subsidiary's participation in the animal feed phosphates cartel. The cartel lasted from 1978 until 2004. Unlike the other five groups of animal feed phosphate producers involved, the Roullier group decided to drop out of the settlement negotiations after hearing the range of the fine that the Commission intended to impose if the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from