Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2016

Court Hears Cartel Damages Claim Despite Arbitration Clause

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Contributor
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Our clients are increasingly operating in South-East Asia and require legal assistance in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

An arbitration clause did not prevent the Rotterdam District Court from considering itself competent to review a damages claim initiated by a litigation vehicle against a number of lift manufacturers...

NetherlandsAntitrust/Competition Law

An arbitration clause did not prevent the Rotterdam District Court from considering itself competent to review a damages claim initiated by a litigation vehicle against a number of lift manufacturers, following a cartel decision by the European Commission. According to the court, the arbitration clause laid down in the lift manufacturers' customer contracts only applies to disputes directly linked to the contract and which are foreseeable at the time of the conclusion of the contract. Given their secretive nature, cartel arrangements and the resulting litigation are not foreseeable for non-cartel participants. Companies should therefore keep in mind that they cannot always rely on these clauses in cartel damages claims.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from