Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JANUARY 2020

Mauritius Court Accepts Appleby's Proposition In Landmark Decision

Appleby
Appleby
Contributor
Appleby

Appleby

Appleby is a leading offshore law firm. The team of legal specialists advise global public and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Appleby

Appleby acted for the successful Respondent in the landmark decision of Mauritian Eagle Leasing Company Ltd v Boojhawon B. (2019 SCJ 347) delivered by Judge O.B. Madhub

MauritiusLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Appleby acted for the successful Respondent in the landmark decision of Mauritian Eagle Leasing Company Ltd v Boojhawon B. (2019 SCJ 347) delivered by Judge O.B. Madhub on 23 December 2019. The Court accepted Appleby's proposition that an Order authorising the "saisie revendication" (provisional attachment) of a leased vehicle can be verbally opposed at the time of the Order's execution and that such an opposition cannot trigger contempt of court proceedings.

Background

The Applicant, a private leasing company, applied for the Respondent to be held in contempt of court for having failed to comply with an Order for a 'saisie revendication' (provisional attachment) of three vehicles and one piece of machinery. The application was based on the Respondent's failure to hand over the items to the Usher at the time of the execution of the Order.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from