Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 NOVEMBER 2025

Collision Of Continental And Common Law Approaches To Generative AI Training

GTG Legal
GTG Legal
Contributor
GTG Legal

GTG Legal

Since its founding in 1997, GTG has been at the forefront of Malta’s legal profession, blending...

View firm profile
Explore more from GTG Legal

Two landmark court decisions issued within a week of each other in November 2025, namely, GEMA v. OpenAI and Getty Images v. Stability AI, have created a striking legal divergence...

MaltaTechnology

Generative AI Training

Two landmark court decisions issued within a week of each other in November 2025, namely, GEMA v. OpenAI and Getty Images v. Stability AI, have created a striking legal divergence that fundamentally reshapes the international landscape for artificial intelligence copyright liability. Whereas the Munich Regional Court established sweeping protections for copyright holders by treating model "memorisation" as actionable reproduction, the UK High Court left British jurisprudence conspicuously silent on the merits of AI training liability (Read more here.) One must also consider the third judicial approach emerged from Hamburg's September 2024 judgment in Robert Kneschke v. LAION e.V., which provisionally upheld text-and-data-mining ("TDM") privileges for research purposes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from