Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2021

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

The Warrant Of Prohibitory Injunction

In its judgement delivered on the 15 September 2021, in the names of Aurelio Tanti (the "Plaintiff") vs Chris D'Anastasi (the "Defendant"), the First Hall Civil Court (the "Court")...

MaltaReal Estate and Construction

In its judgement delivered on the 15 September 2021, in the names of Aurelio Tanti (the “Plaintiff”) vs Chris D'Anastasi (the “Defendant”), the First Hall Civil Court (the “Court”), presided over by Justice Dr Christian Falzon Scerri, had to consider the requisite elements for the issuance of a warrant of prohibitory injunction.

In the case at hand, the Plaintiff owned a first-floor apartment in a block of flats in, Triq San Pawl, Had-Dingli. The Defendant had procured a planning permit from the Planning Authority to develop a block of flats including garages directly adjacent to the block of flats in which the plaintiff owned his apartment. According to the Plaintiff and his architect, the approved development plans showed that the Defendant was to undertake excavation works at a distance which was less than the minimum seventy-six centimetres distance prescribed by article 439 of the Civil Code, Chapter 16 of the Laws of Malta (the “Civil Code”). Moreover, the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from