Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MAY 2026

Court Rejects €160,000 Claim Where Planning Permit Failed To Reflect Parties’ Intended Development

This case, which was determined by the First Hall of the Civil Court by means of a final judgment dated the 25th of May 2026, concerned a private agreement dated 8 April 2013, under which the plaintiffs committed...

MaltaReal Estate and Construction

This case, which was determined by the First Hall of the Civil Court by means of a final judgment dated the 25th of May 2026, concerned a private agreement dated 8 April 2013, under which the plaintiffs committed to obtaining a MEPA planning permit, within one year, for the extension of the roof of a Valletta property acquired by the defendant. If the permit was obtained, defendant was obliged to pay the plaintiffs €160,000 within 15 working days from the date of its issue.

The plaintiffs asserted that they had fulfilled their contractual obligations, since planning permit PA/01392/13 was issued on the 14th of November 2013, well within the stipulated one-year period. On that basis, they claimed that Defendant was liable to pay the agreed sum of €160,000 together with interest and costs. Defendant contested the claim. He argued that the permit could not be treated as final, as it was subject to an appeal lodged by a neighbouring owner. More significantly, he maintained that the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from