Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2026

Article 56A In Action: Malta's Public Policy Shield Confirmed By The Courts

A recent judgment of the Maltese courts has delivered the first clear judicial endorsement of Article 56A of the Gaming Act, confirming Malta's position on the non-recognition...

MaltaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

A recent judgment of the Maltese courts has delivered the first clear judicial endorsement of Article 56A of the Gaming Act, confirming Malta's position on the non-recognition of foreign judgments that undermine the validity of gaming services provided under a  Malta Gaming Authority (“MGA”) licence.

Brief Overview

The case arose from an Austrian judgment ordering an MGA-licensed operator, Virtual Digital Services Limited, to refund approximately €488,000 to an Austrian player. The Austrian court concluded that the operator's services were unlawful under Austrian gambling law because the operator did not hold a local licence. The claimant sought to have that judgment recognised and enforced in Malta under Regulation (EU) 1215/2012. The Maltese operator resisted recognition, relying, among other grounds, on Article 56A of the Gaming Act. The Court accepted this defence and refused recognition.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from