Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JUNE 2026

MFSA Enforcement And The Limits Of Appeal Rights In Malta: Key Takeaways From The Phoenix Judgment

Mamo TCV Advocates
Mamo TCV Advocates
Contributor
Mamo TCV Advocates

Mamo TCV Advocates

Mamo TCV Advocates is one of Malta’s leading law firms, with significant depth and expertise across...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mamo TCV Advocates

The Civil Court, First Hall (Constitutional Jurisdiction), in the judgment Phoenix Payments Limited (now Lazarus Long Limited) v the Malta Financial Services Authority and the State Advocate...

MaltaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Civil Court, First Hall (Constitutional Jurisdiction), in the judgment Phoenix Payments Limited (now Lazarus Long Limited) v the Malta Financial Services Authority and the State Advocate (Application Number 272/2021), delivered by the Honorable Madam Justice Rachel Montebello on 27 April 2026, examined the administrative enforcement powers of the Malta Financial Services Authority (“MFSA”) and, critically, whether the available appeal mechanism satisfies the right to a fair hearing.

Phoenix’s Application

Phoenix Payments Limited (subsequently renamed Lazarus Long Limited) (“Phoenix”), a financial institution licensed and regulated by the MFSA under the Financial Institutions Act (Chapter 376 of the Laws of Malta) (the “FIA”), was subjected to an administrative penalty of €32,400 by the MFSA under Articles 13 and 23 of the FIA and the Fines and Penalties for Offences Regulations (S.L. 376.02) (the “Regulations”), following findings of regulatory shortcomings in Phoenix’s

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from