Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 JANUARY 2018

Limiting post-termination of employment restraints?

Mamo TCV Advocates
Mamo TCV Advocates
Contributor
Mamo TCV Advocates

Mamo TCV Advocates

Mamo TCV Advocates is one of Malta’s leading law firms, with significant depth and expertise across...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mamo TCV Advocates

In a Court of Appeal judgment dated the 27th October 2017, in the names of Paul u martu Mariella Mizzi kif ezercenti l-kummerc that l-isem "The Foto Grafer" v David Serracino et, the court considered a clause in a contract which effectively bound an employee to his employer for a period of at least two years of employment, failing which the employee was liable to pay to the employer the sum of Lm10,000.

MaltaEmployment and HR

In a Court of Appeal judgment dated the 27th October 2017, in the names of Paul u martu Mariella Mizzi kif ezercenti l-kummerc that l-isem "The Foto Grafer" v David Serracino et, the court considered a clause in a contract which effectively bound an employee to his employer for a period of at least two years of employment, failing which the employee was liable to pay to the employer the sum of Lm10,000. This sum was to be repaid back in view of the investment made by the employer to train the employee for the initial two years and in part as indemnity for breach of contract. The defendant ex-employee appealed the judgment of the first court which had held that the clause was enforceable.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from