Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 APRIL 2020

Vacant Possession: A Developer's Horror Story?

Based on a true story, Witter Yee recounts the tale of two conflicting Court of Appeal decisions.

MalaysiaReal Estate and Construction

Based on a true story, Witter Yee recounts the tale of two conflicting Court of Appeal decisions.

Housing developers in Malaysia thought they had found some relief when the Court of Appeal decided that the date of delivery of vacant possession should be calculated from the date of the sale and purchase agreement. Alas, their relief was short-lived when two days later, a different panel of the Court of Appeal decided that it should be calculated from the date when the booking fee was paid.

This is the tale of the Court of Appeal's decisions on 20 August 2019 in the case of GJH Avenue Sdn Bhd v Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah, Kementerian Kesejahteraan Bandar, Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan & Ors [2019] 6 AMR 112 ("GJH Avenue") and on 22 August 2019 in the case of PJD Regency Sdn Bhd v Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah & Anor (Civil Appeal No: W-01(A)-174-03/2018) ("PJD Regency").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from