Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 NOVEMBER 2018

The Eye Appeal

Wai Hong and Brenda explain a significant decision on medical negligence by the Federal Court.

MalaysiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Wai Hong and Brenda explain a significant decision on medical negligence by the Federal Court.

BACKGROUND FACTS

The recent decision of the Federal Court in Dr Hari Krishnan & Anor v Megat Noor Ishak bin Megat Ibrahim & Anor and another appeal [2018] 3 CLJ 427 arose from a medical negligence claim. The patient underwent an eye operation for retinal detachment and bucked on the operating table leading to blindness in one eye.

After a full trial, the High Court held that the surgeon and the anaesthetist (collectively "doctors") involved in the procedure were negligent in the diagnosis and treatment of the patient and in failing to warn the patient of the risks in the operation. The High Court also found the private hospital where the operation was carried out, vicariously liable for the negligence of the doctors. The patient was awarded RM200,000 as general damages and an unprecedented sum of RM1,000,000 as aggravated damages.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from