Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JANUARY 2021

Public Auction Derailed By Movement Control Order?

The Plaintiff averred that the extension of time applied for was merely to substitute the 50 days lost as a result of the MCO.

MalaysiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

 Introduction

The High Court in the recent case of Ho Kean Pin v Malayan Banking Berhad & Anor  [2020] MLJU 1435 ruled that the inherent jurisdiction of the Court cannot be invoked in favour of a successful bidder of a land purchased at a public auction to extend the timeline for payment of the purchase price  as a result of the Movement Control Order ("MCO"), without first ensuring that the Chargor's interest is not in any way jeopardised by the same.

Background Facts

The Plaintiff was the successful bidder at a public auction held on 7.1.2020, whereby he had duly paid the deposit of 10% out of the reserve price prior to the auction and had thereafter successfully secured a loan from a Bank on 21.1.2020 for the purpose of paying the balance purchase price. Pursuant to Clause 16 of the Conditions for Sale (attached to the Proclamation of Sale) and Section 257(1)(g) of the National Land Code 1965, the Plaintiff was to settle the payment of the balance purchase

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from