Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JANUARY 2021

Applications To Transfer Cases – A New Twist To The Tale?

The cause of action arose in Kelantan as the lands were situated in Kelantan and the private caveats were entered at the Land and Mines Office, Kelantan.

MalaysiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Recently, the High Court in Liziz Plantation v Liew Ah Yong [2020] 10 CLJ 94 dismissed an application to transfer a case from a High Court in one state to a High Court in another state, holding inter alia that the increasing acceptance of remote communication technology has made the issue of having to physically travel to any court very much less important when considering the transfer of a case.

Brief facts


The plaintiff had commenced an action against the defendant pursuant to the National Land Code 1965, seeking, amongst others, an order that the private caveats lodged by the defendant on certain pieces of land be removed.

The defendant, pursuant to Order 57 of the Rules of Court 2012 ("ROC 2012"), section 23 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 and/or the inherent jurisdiction of the court, sought an order that the action be transferred from the High Court at Ipoh to the High Court at Kota Bahru on the grounds that:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from