Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JULY 2011

Trustees Disclosure – Two Recent Decisions From The Common Law Jurisdictions

Baker & Partners LLP
Baker & Partners LLP
Contributor
Baker & Partners LLP

Baker & Partners LLP

The Cayman Islands office was opened in late 2020 with Robert Jones as the sole attorney. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker & Partners LLP

The thorny issue of what a trustee must disclose at the request of any beneficiary is a topic which has received much judicial guidance over recent years.

JerseyWealth Management

The thorny issue of what a trustee must disclose at the request of any beneficiary is a topic which has received much judicial guidance over recent years. The key decision for trustees is still that of Schmidt v Rosewood [2003] UKPC 26 which imposes judicial supervision over disclosure decisions in proper cases. Two recent cases, Breakspear v Ackland [2008] EWCH 220 and Wingate v Butterfield Trust [2008] WTLR 357 give further guidance to Jersey trustees in this most difficult area.

In Breakspear v Ackland the key question was whether a letter of wishes should be disclosed. In Wingate v Butterfield, the question was whether the documents of a wholly owned subsidiary company to a discretionary trust should be disclosed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from