Introduction
The long running dispute in the Tantular litigation has finally reached the
Privy Council and some crucial questions about the interaction
between Jersey trusts and the mechanics of Jersey's
confiscation regime have now finally been settled.
Essentially, the Tantular litigation has been about the
international reach of saisies judiciaries (a species of restraint
order imposed by Jersey's Royal Court over property pending
confiscation proceedings). Specifically, the case concerns whether
the assignment of a mortgage over a trust-owned property in
Singapore, in this case by Credit Suisse, amounts to dealing with
confiscated property in a way prohibited by the saisie. This
article aims to provide an outline description of the key issues
decided in the appeal and the underlying principles that may inform
later cases.