Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 APRIL 2026

Jersey's Approach To Asset Freezing – Cross Border Cooperation

Collas Crill
Collas Crill
Contributor
Collas Crill

Collas Crill

Firm Details: Chief Executive Officer: Jason Romer Managing Partners: Bermuda: Lilla Zuill, BVI:...

View firm profile
Explore more from Collas Crill

The Jersey Courts maintain the island's reputation as an international finance centre through their approach to freezing injunctions and asset preservation. This article examines how Jersey balances international comity with jurisdictional restraint, exploring when courts will grant freezing orders in aid of foreign proceedings, the treatment of worldwide freezing orders from foreign courts, and the unique protections afforded by Jersey trust structures and firewall provisions.

JerseyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

One of the ways in which the Courts of Jersey maintain the reputation and integrity of the island as an international finance centre is by granting freezing injunctions, in appropriate circumstances, to provide support to overseas courts.

In the leading case of Solvalub Ltd v Match Investment Ltd [1996] JLR 361, the Jersey Court of Appeal aptly explained the policy behind Jersey's approach to freezing injunctions in the following way :

'…the availability of the relief is desirable in the interests of comity with the courts of other countries and in the interests of Jersey’s reputation as a financial centre.' per Le Quesne, J.A at (page 369, line 22 – page 370, line 45).

Solvalub is now some 30 years old. However, this sentiment holds true today. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from