Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MAY 2013

Shah And Garnet – Lessons To Be Learnt For FSBs

Collas Crill
Collas Crill
Contributor
Collas Crill

Collas Crill

Firm Details: Chief Executive Officer: Jason Romer Managing Partners: Bermuda: Lilla Zuill, BVI:...

View firm profile
Explore more from Collas Crill

The Shahs' claim was in relation to a delay in the processing of four separate payment instructions.

JerseyFinance and Banking

There must have been close to an audible sigh of relief from banks and other financial institutions when the final decision in the landmark case Shah and another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd ("Shah") was handed down by the High Court of Justice in May2012, not least because it ended four and a half years of litigation, six reported decisions (three from the Court of Appeal) and a good deal of uncertainty during that time.

THE FACTS

Mr and Mrs Shah had held accounts with HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited ("HSBC") since 2002.

The Shahs' claim was in relation to a delay in the processing of four separate payment instructions.

In fact the delay was due to HSBC suspecting money laundering on the part of Mr Shah, HSBC making a suspicious activity report to the Serious Organised Crime Agency, and then waiting for the appropriate consent to proceed with the requested transfer of funds.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from