Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 SEPTEMBER 2011

Permafreeze: The Judgment In Customs & Excise v Garnet Investments Ltd

Baker & Partners LLP
Baker & Partners LLP
Contributor
Baker & Partners LLP

Baker & Partners LLP

The Cayman Islands office was opened in late 2020 with Robert Jones as the sole attorney. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker & Partners LLP

Those who thought the days of the extended informal freeze may be over, think again.

JerseyCriminal Law

Those who thought the days of the extended informal freeze may be over, think again. Many in the financial services industry were heartened by a decision of the Royal Court of Guernsey earlier this year which granted an application for judicial review and quashed a refusal of consent by the Financial Investigation Service ("FIS") to the release of funds held by BNP. But a recent Court of Appeal judgment in The Chief Officer, Customs & Excise, Immigration and Nationality Service v Garnet Investments Limited [July 2011] has reversed that decision and held that where there is a suspicion that has not been dispelled, the police must be entitled to refuse consent whatever period of time has elapsed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from