Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JULY 2016

Injunctions In Fraud Claims: Should Banks Always Get Their Costs?

Baker & Partners LLP
Baker & Partners LLP
Contributor
Baker & Partners LLP

Baker & Partners LLP

The Cayman Islands office was opened in late 2020 with Robert Jones as the sole attorney. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker & Partners LLP

Should financial institutions be reimbursed for the costs incurred by assisting victims of fraud?

JerseyCriminal Law

Should financial institutions be reimbursed for the costs incurred by assisting victims of fraud?

It is common for a claimant to seek an injunction as part of a legal strategy to recover their property. The two sought most frequently are a Norwich Pharmacal Order ("NPO") and a Freezing Order ("FO"). A NPO requires the respondent to provide information which will assist the applicant in pursuing their claim – normally by identifying the wrongdoer and/or disclosing information necessary to bring a claim. Generally a NPO is available against a party which has become involved in the alleged wrongdoing (innocently or not) but is unlikely to be a defendant at trial. A FO restrains a party from disposing of or dealing with assets and can be obtained against a defendant or a third party to prevent assets being dissipated to frustrate enforcement of a judgment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from