Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2025

Sanctions Versus Contractual Liability In Jersey Law

Collas Crill
Collas Crill
Contributor
Collas Crill

Collas Crill

Firm Details: Chief Executive Officer: Jason Romer Managing Partners: Bermuda: Lilla Zuill, BVI:...

View firm profile
Explore more from Collas Crill

The Jersey Royal Court decision of OWH v RTI [2025] JRC137 on 22 May 2025 addresses the challenge to the enforcement of an arbitral award where sanctions are at play.

JerseyCorporate/Commercial Law

The Jersey Royal Court decision of OWH v RTI [2025] JRC137 on 22 May 2025 addresses the challenge to the enforcement of an arbitral award where sanctions are at play.

It provides valuable insight into the considerations of the court in Jersey (the Court) in the emerging area of sanctions law where case law remains light.

The key issue for RTI Ltd (a Jersey company) was whether enforcement of the arbitral award would be contrary to public policy in Jersey as reflected in Article 46A of the Sanctions and Asset-Freezing (Jersey) Law, 2019 (the Jersey Sanctions Law):

'A person is not liable to any civil proceedings to which that person would, in the absence of this Article, have been liable in respect of an act, if at the time of the act the person reasonably believed the act was necessary to comply with an obligation or prohibition imposed:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from