Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 DECEMBER 2016

Jersey Freezing Orders

Carey Olsen
Carey Olsen
Contributor
Carey Olsen

Carey Olsen

With a heritage that dates back to 1898, Carey Olsen is one of the most established and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Carey Olsen

A number of court decisions have demonstrated that discretionary trust assets are not always immune from freezing injunctions obtained against settlors/beneficiaries.

JerseyCorporate/Commercial Law

KEY POINTS

WHAT IS THE ISSUE?

A number of court decisions have demonstrated that discretionary trust assets are not always immune from freezing injunctions obtained against settlors/beneficiaries.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR ME?

A freezing injunction is likely to impact the trustee's duties and the day-to-day administration of the trust, and may lead to trustees being dragged into proceedings even if they are not alleged to have been involved in or aware of wrongdoing on the part of the settlor.

WHAT CAN I TAKE AWAY?

An understanding of the approach of the courts, including those in Jersey, to this issue.

The purpose of a standard freezing injunction is to freeze the defendant's assets,1 on an interim basis or post-judgment, so that they are available for the enforcement of a future judgment. In circumstances in which valuable assets can be moved to an obscure jurisdiction on the basis of a simple share-transfer form, the freezing injunction is an essential

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from