Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MARCH 2019

Blocking Orders Permissible Against ISPS

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Contributor
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

At Fross Zelnick, we secure and defend our clients’ most valuable assets—their brands, designs, and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

On January 1, 2019, the Knesset (Israeli Parliament) approved Amendment No. 5 to Israel's Copyright Law, which adds the following provisions:

IsraelIntellectual Property
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Author LinkedIn connections

On January 1, 2019, the Knesset (Israeli Parliament) approved Amendment No. 5 to Israel's Copyright Law, which adds the following provisions:

  1. Indirect copyright infringement by making copyright-protected content available to the public (new Section 48A);
  2. Restriction of access to an internet site by court order (new Section 53A); and
  3. Exposing the identity of copyright infringers on the internet and use of "orphan" works (new Part H1).

I. Indirect Infringement

An indirect infringer is a "person" who makes copyright-protected work available to the public after the work has already been made available to the public in an infringing manner by another party. A court can issue blocking orders against an indirect infringer if the infringer knew or should have known that the work was copyright-protected and that the original display of the work was an infringement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from