Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2026

Part 2: AI Act Articles 50(3) And 50(4) Transparency Obligations

William Fry LLP
William Fry LLP
Contributor
William Fry LLP

William Fry LLP

William Fry advises leading Irish and international companies, covering both the public and private...

View firm profile
Explore more from William Fry LLP

The European Commission has issued interpretive guidelines on Article 50 of the AI Act, clarifying transparency obligations for emotion recognition systems, biometric categorization, and deepfake content.

IrelandPrivacy

In Part 1 of this series, we examined commentary by the Commission to assist in navigating concepts of Article 50 that were initially unclear.

We also discussed the Commission’s interpretation of Articles 50(1) and 50(2), including disclosure obligations for AI-human interactions, the narrow scope of the “obviousness” exception, and the marking requirements for AI-generated or manipulated content. We also considered the treatment of GPAI, open-source and agentic AI systems, and the limited exclusions identified in the Guidelines.

Part 2 of this series examines the remaining transparency obligations under Article 50, focusing on emotion recognition and biometric categorisation systems under Article 50(3), alongside the disclosure requirements for deepfakes and AI-generated content informing matters of public interest under Article 50(4). It also considers the practical operation of the artistic and satirical carve-outs, retrospective labelling expectations, and the emerging Code of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from