Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 APRIL 2016

Are Retailers Responsible For User Activity On Their Free Wi-Fi?

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Contributor
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Managing Partner: Will Carmody Chair: Philip Nolan Number of partners: 124 Languages: French,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Retailers, who in the course of business offer free unprotected Wi-Fi, should not be held responsible if their customers use the service to infringe copyright.

IrelandIntellectual Property

Retailers, who in the course of business offer free unprotected Wi-Fi, should not be held responsible if their customers use the service to infringe copyright. This is according to the preliminary Opinion of the Advocate General ("AG") of the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") in the long-running German case of Tobias McFadden v Sony Music Entertainment Germany GmbH (C-484/14). In particular, the AG found that retailers offering such Wi-Fi may be able to rely on the 'mere conduit' defence against liability. The AG also offered his views on the situations in which a national court could order a retailer to take steps to prevent the infringement.

Questions for the CJEU

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from