Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 MARCH 2023

Monthly News Updates - February 2023

Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Contributor
Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal is a leading full-service Indian law firm, founded in 2008, providing comprehensive...

View firm profile
Explore more from Phoenix Legal

A writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (Constitution) questioning the jurisdiction of the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (ST)-cum Revisional Authority...

IndiaStrategy
Date Developments Case Name
Constitution

01.02.2023

A writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (Constitution) questioning the jurisdiction of the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (ST)-cum Revisional Authority for reopening proceedings in a suo moto revisional power conferred under Section 34 of Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (VAT Act). The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed the petition declining interference, on the ground of availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 33 of VAT Act. The Hon'ble Court held that there can be no presumption that the appellate authority would not be able to grant relief sought in the writ petition. An appeal by special leave against High Court's judgment was preferred before the Supreme Court of India.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from