Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 APRIL 2026

Waiver And Acquiescence In Challenges To Arbitral Tribunal Constitution

S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices
Contributor
S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices is a full-service law firm headquartered in Delhi NCR. The firm has 300+...

View firm profile
Explore more from S&A Law Offices

The decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. M/s R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd. is a significant development in Indian arbitration jurisprudence. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has addressed a pertinent issue, i.e., whether a party

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

INTRODUCTION

1. The decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. M/s R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd. is a significant development in Indian arbitration jurisprudence. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has addressed a pertinent issue, i.e., whether a party that has silently participated in the formation of the Arbitral Tribunal can subsequently challenge such formation on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction due to improper constitution of the arbitral Tribunal. The Hon'ble Court provided much-needed clarification on the interplay between Section 16 and Section 4 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("the Act") by affirming that parties that remain silent during the constitution process of arbitral tribunals cannot later challenge its constitution.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from