Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 DECEMBER 2021

To Appoint Or Not To Appoint: A Dispute Resolved

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Act") was enacted to have a unified legal framework for domestic arbitration, international arbitration and enforcement of foreign awards

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Act") was enacted to have a unified legal framework for domestic arbitration, international arbitration and enforcement of foreign awards. This Act has been widely adopted from the UNCITRAL Model Laws. The UNCITRAL Model Laws emphasize on the party autonomy1 by which the parties are free to choose the procedure for arbitration.

The parties are, thus, free to appoint an arbitrator of their choice and when no consensus is arrived at within 30 days from the receipt of request by one party from another2, the Arbitration Institution designated by the Supreme Court or the High Court (as the case may be)3 will appoint an arbitrator. Until the Arbitration (Amendment) Act, 2019 is notified by the Government, the Supreme Court or the High Court may appoint the arbitrator. Importantly, the Courts shall not overlook the procedure as agreed by the parties and suo moto appoint an arbitrator.4 However, the Arbitrator

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from