Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2025

Supreme Court Clarifies Limits Of Non-Signatory Arbitration Claims

In a significant pronouncement strengthening the principles of party autonomy and contractual consent in arbitration law, the Supreme Court of India in Hindustan Petroleum...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

In a significant pronouncement strengthening the principles of party autonomy and contractual consent in arbitration law, the Supreme Court of India in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. BCL Secure Premises Pvt. Ltd. set aside the Bombay High Court's decision to refer a non-signatory to arbitration under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A&C Act”). The Court reaffirmed that mere commercial involvement or a back-to-back arrangement does not automatically confer the status of a “veritable party” capable of invoking an arbitration clause. The judgment provides crucial clarity on the scope of judicial scrutiny at the referral stage and the circumstances under which non-signatories may or may not be bound by arbitration agreements an area that has seen evolving judicial refinement after the Cox & Kings rulings. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from